THE SECRET OF ORGANIZATIONS (AND PEOPLE) THAT TURN FAILURES INTO GOLD

“The master asked the disciple:
— Do you know why the bamboo breaks in the storm,
while the reed only bends?
Because one believes it is strong,
the other knows the wisdom of tactical flexibility.
The real question was never about falling or not…
but what you choose to learn
while you’re on the ground.” — Marcello de Souza

Imagine a laboratory where, instead of celebrating discoveries, scientists meticulously collect and catalog failures. Sounds paradoxical? This is precisely how truly disruptive minds operate. Clayton Christensen unveils an ancestral principle when he says, “Disruptive innovations arise not when we ignore failures, but when we delve into them, questioning the assumptions we take for granted.” This echoes Eastern philosophy: the art of kintsugi, which repairs broken pottery with gold, turning flaws into singular beauty. But what can neuroscience, social psychology, and marginal thinkers teach us about this cognitive alchemy?

The greatest disruptive innovations are not born from ignoring errors, but from a deep, inquisitive dive into their depths. I invite you to abandon linear, habitual thinking and step into a realm where doubt fertilizes creativity and transformation. A superficial gaze traps us in repetition; a deep gaze opens the doors to reinvention and genuine excellence.

We live in a society obsessed with immediate results and flawless success, where few dare to explore the shadows of failure. True innovation does not flourish under the spotlight of achievements, but in the shadows of rigorously dissected errors. Christensen reveals a central paradox: our aversion to error limits our ability to transcend the obvious. What if, instead of fearing failure, we began to revere it as a silent master?

The Wealth of Error as a Driver of Innovation
“There are falls that uplift the soul. There are failures that open portals. Only those who listen to the silence of their own ruptures can rewrite their inner symphony.” — Marcello de Souza

Make no mistake: failure is not the villain in the evolutionary process of knowledge and transformation. On the contrary, it is fertile ground for the emergence of the new. When we avoid or mask imperfections, we crystallize archaic models that resist renewal. A genuinely transformative gaze — inspired by systemic, behavioral, and philosophical paradigms — dives into the discomfort of vulnerabilities to uncover the hidden mechanisms that govern our cognitive, emotional, and social processes.

Failure thus becomes a starting point to revisit assumptions, dismantle ingrained beliefs, and challenge common sense. This attitude demands intellectual and emotional courage — a willingness to leave the comfort zone of certainty and take cognitive risks. Neuroscience confirms: such an active posture engages neural networks associated with deep learning and brain plasticity, strengthening cognitive and emotional resilience.

Gilbert Simondon reminds us that individuation is a continuous process — the subject is never complete, but always becoming. In this logic, error and imperfection are not deviations but foundational conditions of the new. Gaston Bachelard, in turn, emphasizes that knowledge advances through epistemological ruptures — moments when old knowledge is undone so that new horizons may emerge. And such ruptures only occur when we dare to confront error and embrace uncertainty.

Consider the example of a conductor. Faced with an out-of-tune orchestra, he could choose to hide the flaws in silence or repeat mechanically until they are masked. But by choosing to listen attentively to each slip, each note out of tune, he transforms the perception of error into a symphony of possibilities. He understands that harmony does not arise from immaculate perfection, but from the sensitive dialogue between dissonances and inspired corrections.

Isabelle Stengers invites us to see science — and by extension, innovation — not as linear and predictable processes, but as profoundly interactive practices, rooted in experience and marked by indeterminacy. Bringing this perspective to organizational environments, it becomes clear that knowledge is not born from straight paths, but from a living weave, interlaced with culture, emotions, tensions, and everyday mistakes.

In the age of PERMAVUCALUTION — where Permanence, Emotion, Resilience, Meaning, Acceleration, VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity), and Evolution define the new normal — innovation only flourishes when we recognize that real learning occurs in encounters with the unpredictable. Like the “adventure of thinking” proposed by Stengers, organizational development requires openness to dialogue among diverse knowledges, multiple perspectives, and realities in tension. A living lab, where failures are not eliminated, but treated as catalysts for significant discoveries.

Imagine a team that approaches its challenges not as problems to be solved by predefined methods, but as an ecosystem where each voice, each mistake, and each attempt contributes to the collective construction of meaning. This systemic approach enables the blossoming of collective intelligence — which goes beyond the sum of its parts — turning the organization into an adaptive organism that learns from its imperfections.

Leadership That Listens to the Grey Zones

From this perspective, leadership abandons the hierarchical model of command and reinvents itself as a facilitator of living networks of collaboration, listening, and experimentation. The leader who embodies this vision understands that, for an organization to evolve, it is essential to create psychologically safe spaces for error, cultivate active listening, and value constant questioning. Disruptive innovation, therefore, does not emerge from the pursuit of absolute perfection, but from the courage to explore the grey zones of the unknown and allow the unexpected to emerge as raw material for transformation.

From a neuroscientific viewpoint, this posture strengthens networks responsible for cognitive and emotional flexibility — essential for adapting in volatile and complex contexts. Psychologically, it fosters organizational resilience and genuine engagement, nurtured by the sense of belonging to a process that values learning from failures — not as stigmas, but as precious sources of reinvention.

In this way, the organization becomes an epistemic organism in constant individuation, where error is recognized as a vital impulse that triggers paradigm shifts and opens paths to the new. In this continuous movement of reinvention, organizations cease to be predictive machines and become living ecosystems, capable of flourishing amid the chaos and complexity of the contemporary world.

Now, Bring This Image into Your Own Life
How many times have you avoided facing the discomfort of a mistake — personal, professional, emotional? And how many growth opportunities were lost in that silence or mechanical repetition?

The deep listening of our own failures is, above all, an act of courage and lucidity — a practice of presence that invites us to constant reinvention, the expansion of consciousness, and the reconstruction of our ways of being and acting in the world.

Questioning Certainties to Untie Invisible Knots

“True wisdom does not lie in avoiding the fall, but in learning to rise with greater courage and vision. For it is in the fertile soil of error that the seeds of the extraordinary bloom.” – Marcello de Souza

We live immersed in complex systems, where beliefs and paradigms traverse generations, solidifying as absolute truths. However, disruptive change only occurs when we cast a critical and refined gaze upon these “certainties.” Questioning is not a mere intellectual exercise but an indispensable tool to reveal the invisible knots that imprison our potentials.

In this sense, philosophy teaches us that questioning is a fundamental act for the emancipation of thought. Breaking with dogmatism implies awareness of one’s own ignorance, a condition that makes us capable of learning, unlearning, and relearning. In the organizational sphere, leaders who cultivate this stance inspire cultures of continuous learning, where error is integrated as a strategic element of innovation.

The Power of “Not Knowing”: The Beginning of Transformation

“Doubt, when honored, is the seed of wisdom. Error, when listened to, is the path of transformation. And the silence that allows itself to question is the cradle of the new.” – Marcello de Souza

Socrates, when stating “I only know that I know nothing,” did not proclaim ignorance as an end but as a starting point for genuine wisdom. This awareness of incompleteness – which resonates with the individuation proposed by Simondon – invites us to inhabit the space between crystallized knowledge and possible knowledge. True transformation emerges when we allow the void of doubt to replace the rigidity of certainties.

From a neuroscience perspective, the state of uncertainty activates brain regions related to curiosity and intrinsic motivation, such as the prefrontal cortex and the dopaminergic system. Thus, questioning is not only a philosophical attitude but also a biological engine that drives adaptive learning. In organizational environments, this translates into greater openness to experimentation, agility in the face of the unexpected, and the strengthening of collective intelligence.

Identifying Invisible Knots: Beliefs Operating Beneath the Surface of Culture

Much of the obstacles to innovation and personal or institutional evolution reside in unconscious patterns – the so-called “invisible knots” that structure our ways of thinking, feeling, and acting. These are internalized narratives that shape reality without us realizing their influence. These knots act like psychic algorithms, reiterating automatic responses and obstructing the emergence of the new.

Behavioral Psychology, as well as processes of Cognitive Behavioral Development or even Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), reveal that many of these knots originate from experiential avoidance mechanisms – the almost instinctive impulse to flee emotional, cognitive, or social discomfort. By not questioning these constructions, we perpetuate maladaptive patterns that sabotage our development. Conscious questioning, on the other hand, exposes these hidden shackles and allows powerful reframings.

Between Attachment to Control and Liberation through Doubt

Organizations that operate under the imperative of predictability tend to cultivate a culture of risk and ambiguity aversion. In these contexts, error is punished, questioning is silenced, and innovation becomes hostage to rigid processes. However, the reality of PERMAVUCALUTION demands precisely the opposite: flexible structures, questioning leadership, and environments that welcome the unexpected.

Inspired by Edgar Morin, we can say that complex thinking is the one that embraces uncertainty without paralysis. It is a form of consciousness that recognizes the multiple layers of reality, where partial truths coexist in creative tension. Leaders operating from this place become artisans of ambiguity, cultivating spaces of dialogue where doubt is valued as a source of power, not as a weakness.

Discomfort as an Evolutionary Compass

The presence of discomfort – whether individual or collective – is often a sign that something needs to be questioned. Instead of avoiding this sensation, we must welcome it as an evolutionary compass. Discomfort reveals where invisible knots are operating, where unresolved tensions lie, where the old no longer serves, but the new has not yet emerged.

In practice, this requires leaders and professionals willing to practice radical listening – not only of others but of themselves. To listen to their own inconsistencies, silent discomforts, and unformulated questions. For it is on this fertile ground of internal listening that the greatest leaps of consciousness and deepest changes germinate.

The Subject as Coauthor of Their Own Becoming

In the logic of continuous individuation, doubt does not represent an obstacle but a lever for becoming. The subject who questions their certainties becomes coauthor of their own transformation process. By relinquishing ready-made answers and embracing complexity, they enter a field of creative freedom, where identity is no longer a static label but a living construction in permanent elaboration.

In this scenario, the organization also transforms: from a space of control and predictability to a fertile field of coevolution, where errors are signposts of new paths and questioning becomes daily practice. When doubt becomes culture, innovation becomes inevitable.
And you?

• What certainties are you afraid to question?
• What narratives do you repeat without realizing, and that may be limiting your capacity to evolve?
• As a leader, do you allow your team to question, experiment, and err — or do you demand quick, even if superficial, answers?
• What invisible knots still need to be untied for you and your organization to flourish in a new cycle of consciousness and power?

Sometimes, it is necessary to abandon the security of the known to embrace the risk of becoming. For only that which is capable of questioning itself can truly reinvent itself.

The Role of Reflective Consciousness in Systemic Transformation

Transcending the conventional demands more than superficial changes — it requires cultivating a reflective consciousness capable of grasping the systemic context in all its complexity. This consciousness is not limited to linear or fragmented analysis of phenomena but expands to perceive the multiple layers and dynamic interactions that shape our individual, social, and organizational experiences.

It is an invitation to an integrative perspective, simultaneously embracing cognitive, affective, and social dimensions, promoting an expanded perception that unveils automatic patterns, underlying dysfunctions, and yet-to-be-manifested potentials. Reflective consciousness thus functions as an agent of transformation, shifting the focus from error as failure to error as a gateway for advancement — a vital link for building sustainable behavioral development.

In the daily life of agile organizations, for example, this consciousness is tangible. Environments that encourage honest feedback and open questioning create space for genuine innovation, foster cohesion, and enhance both individual and collective satisfaction. This reality highlights the importance of organizational design intentionally oriented to value error — not as stigma or threat, but as an intrinsic part of the evolutionary process.

Thus, by expanding reflective consciousness, we create cultures where learning, unlearning, and relearning become continuous and integrated practices, promoting the resilience and adaptability necessary to face the complexities of the contemporary world. In this scenario, I repeat here: error ceases to be taboo and transforms into a catalyst for profound changes, an indispensable component for disruptive innovation and the emergence of new ways of thinking, acting, and leading.

The Paradox of Failure and the Blooming of Authenticity

“Failure is an underground river — whoever dares to descend into the darkness
discovers that it does not corrode but carves the canyons through which
the next revolutions will flow.” — Marcello de Souza

Throughout the journey we traverse — from the richness of error as a driver of innovation, through questioning certainties, to developing reflective consciousness — we arrive at a crucial point: to recognize failure not merely as a sign of limitation but as a profound expression of the existential vulnerability that inhabits each individual and organization. This vulnerability, far from being weakness, is the matrix of authenticity, a rare and valuable attribute in the accelerated and competitive landscape that defines our time.

Positive psychology and logotherapy offer us a powerful lens to understand how meaning and purpose emerge precisely from the encounter with our imperfections. Embracing error with integrity and courage is not limited to mere technical repair or correcting a deviation. It is an act of radical humility — an active listening of oneself and others, which opens space for genuine creativity and the flourishing of new cognitive and behavioral possibilities.

This paradox of failure as the seed of personal and collective renewal reinforces the idea that true progress lies in the willingness to navigate uncertainties, embrace complexity, and cultivate psychologically safe environments for error. Only then can the organization and the individual transcend crystallized patterns, transforming into living ecosystems in a constant process of individuation and evolution.

Failure, then, is an underground river that carves the canyons of the next revolutions — not because it destroys, but because it shapes the paths through which the extraordinary flows. Facing this reality is to allow authenticity to sprout from the depths of error, revealing the transformative power of courage and renewed vision.

I invite you, reader, to reflect: how many times has the rejection or concealment of error prevented your authenticity from flourishing? What underground rivers are you willing to explore to carve the canyons of your next great breakthrough?

I. Why Our Brain Sabotages Innovation

“The eagle that flies highest sees the farthest — but also the first to sense the storm.
Is failure a headwind… or the impulse that lifts it?” — Marcello de Souza

The complexity of innovation often stumbles upon a neurocognitive trap: the brain, designed to preserve safety, reacts to the unexpected with resistance and avoidance. Contemporary studies in neuroplasticity show that the prefrontal cortex — the executive center of rational thought and control — triggers alert mechanisms in response to error, promoting avoidance responses that paradoxically limit creativity and adaptability. In organizational settings, this dynamic is exacerbated when errors are punished, creating rigid neural pathways that stifle innovative potential.

The way out of this impasse lies in proposing intentional cognitive friction — calculated exposure to challenges and discomfort necessary for the brain to build new synaptic pathways. Analogous to muscle training, the brain requires micro-injuries to strengthen itself. Research with symphony orchestras illustrates this: the most innovative allowed, analyzed, and learned from “wrong notes” during rehearsals, turning error into a tool for collective improvement.

II. Wittgenstein’s Paradox: How Failures Reveal the Limits of Language

Wittgenstein, in his philosophy of language, shows that many impasses and errors arise from linguistic traps — words and concepts we use without questioning, assumed as absolute truths. In business contexts, for example, the failure of a “revolutionary app” may reside less in technical development and more in the very concept of “revolution” not deconstructed.

An essential self-analysis exercise is to identify the key words that operate as invisible dogmas in failed projects, and then challenge them with new definitions that open space for counterintuitive and disruptive perspectives.

III. The Psychology of Active Forgetting: The Technique of the 3 Burials

Inspired by studies on selective memory, I propose a three-act ritual to transform failure into a tool for lasting learning:

1. Symbolic Burial: Document the error in detail and perform a physical act of release (burning or tearing the document), promoting a neurochemical sense of “turning the page.”
2. Strategic Exhumation: After 30 days, revisit the case with deep questions about hidden patterns and exclusive opportunities emerging from that failure.
3. Transmutation: Create an “anti-manual” with positive rules derived from the experience, transforming what never to do again into principles for constructive action.

IV. The Principle of Controlled Serendipity: When Chance Becomes Method

Disruptive discoveries often arise by chance, but only for those epistemologically prepared to recognize and seize them. MIT research reveals that 78% of great scientific discoveries resulted from “happy errors.” The emblematic example is Viagra, developed from attentive investigation of an unexpected side effect.

To cultivate this serendipity, it is recommended to keep a “diary of anomalies,” recording results that challenge established beliefs, transforming chance into a conscious method of innovation.

V. The Ontology of Failure: Why Some Cultures See Error as a Ghost, Others as Fertilizer

Organizational anthropological analysis identifies three common traits in innovative and resilient environments:

1. Rituals of Vulnerability: Safe spaces where leaders openly share their recent failures, fostering identification and collective trust.
2. Archaeology of Assumptions: Systematic and periodic questioning that challenges truths taken as immutable, paving the way for revision and reinvention.
3. Celebration of Symbolic Deaths: Symbolic events marking the end of failed projects, emphasizing learnings and releasing energy for new cycles.

Finally,

On this journey, we have been invited to look at error not as a stigma, but as the fertile ground of transformation. We start from the understanding that failures are not mere accidents, but rich symbols of meaning — gateways to personal and collective growth.

We deconstruct the myth of linearity, showing that although the brain is programmed for safety, it can open itself to innovation when intentionally challenged. We question the certainties that imprison us, revealing the invisible knots that limit our vision and our capacity to create.

We discover the strength of reflective consciousness, that human ability that goes beyond the surface of events to capture deep patterns, allowing us to act with intentionality and wisdom.

Finally, we confront the paradox of failure, recognizing in it the key to authenticity and reinvention, supported by a philosophical gaze that transcends the simple “right or wrong.”

Thus, the invitation becomes clear and urgent: may we inhabit a mindset where failure is not only accepted but celebrated — as the indispensable raw material of true excellence and innovation.

May this journey provoke in you, my friend, an awakening to a new way of thinking, feeling, and acting, opening space for constructive disruption to flourish, both individually and collectively. After all, in the invisible folds of error lies the seed of transformation — a silent alchemy that only reveals itself to those who have the courage to look inward, challenge their certainties, and allow themselves to be reborn. Let failure, therefore, be not the end, but the continuous beginning of the extraordinary in your life and your organization.

May every knot untied in the fabric of your consciousness be a step toward a more authentic, connected, and vibrant existence. The journey is yours, and the power of change lies in the courage of your reflective gaze.
Let us then proceed with open hearts and restless minds — always willing to learn, unlearn, and reinvent the world around us.

Invitation to reflection and conscious action

• What is your most precious “fertile failure” — the one that, in retrospect, proved essential for your growth?
• What invisible dogma in your field are you willing to challenge this week?
• Which “fertile failure” are you most proud of?
•
Thus, I invite you, reader, to revisit your failures — personal or professional — with a renewed perspective: not as definitive obstacles, but as gateways to constructive disruption. Which deeply rooted beliefs in yourself or your organization deserve to be questioned? How can reflective consciousness be cultivated so that error becomes a resource for excellence?

Failure is not the opposite of success; it is its secret laboratory. The question is: are you willing to enter it without guarantees?

Share your insights, questions, and experiences in the comments. Your perspective is essential to enrich this conversation that transcends the boundaries of traditional knowledge. Leave your thumbs up so that together we can expand this transformative dialogue.

If this approach resonates with you, know that I am available to support you in your journey of self-discovery and personal development.

#marcellodesouza #marcellodesouzaoficial #coachingevoce