THE INVISIBLE THEATRE OF DESIRE: WHEN YOUR RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE STAGE OF A PLAY YOU NEVER WROTE

There is an invisible theatre performing at this very moment.
It is mounted on no physical stage, lit by no ordinary spotlights.
It exists between you and every person you relate to — and you are simultaneously actor, spectator and playwright of a script you have never read.
The curtain never falls.
Rehearsal is life itself.
As for the script?
Ah, you believe you wrote it, but in truth you are only reciting lines that were whispered into your ear long before you realised you were on stage.
Remember the last time you felt deeply drawn to someone.
Not the shallow tug of aesthetic attraction, but the inexplicable magnetism that makes you want to sit close, talk until dawn, peel back every layer of that person.
Now ask an uncomfortable question:
Did you desire that person, or did you desire to be desired by them?
An abyss lies between those two movements, and confusing them is exactly what turns healthy relationships into emotional minefields.
What we call desire in human relationships is rarely what we imagine.
It is not an autonomous impulse, born from the depths of your authentic self, spontaneously directed at someone who caught your attention.
It would be comforting if it were that simple, yet the architecture of desire is infinitely more complex and disturbing.
Your desire does not point at the other — it ricochets off the other and returns to you, freighted with meanings you never meant to place there.
When you say “I desire you”, what you are actually saying is far more convoluted:
“I desire that you desire me, so that I can feel desirable; so that, through your gaze, I can finally feel complete; so that your validation may fill the structural void I have carried since I first recognised myself as separate from the world.”
Sounds less romantic, doesn’t it?
Yet it is precisely this hidden mechanism that silently operates in every unanswered message that makes you anxious, in every like you obsessively check, in every silence you interpret as rejection.
Relationships grow sick not from lack of love, but from excess of economy — libidinal economy, to be precise.
Every interaction becomes an invisible transaction in which you deposit emotional investment, expecting returns in the currency of recognition, validation, reflected desire.
You are not loving — you are bargaining.
Worse: you are bargaining for something no human can actually give you, because the wholeness you seek is an architectural illusion built into the very structure of human consciousness.
There is a constitutive crack at the centre of every subject, a fundamental incompleteness.
The tragedy of the human condition is not that this crack exists — it is the belief that another person can fill it.
That belief hurls us into relationships in which the other ceases to be other and becomes psychic prosthesis, emotional crutch, mirror in which we desperately try to see ourselves whole.
Look at jealousy — not the circumstantial kind grounded in real betrayal, but the structural kind that corrodes even when no cause is apparent.
Where does it come from?
From the terrifying realisation that you need the other’s gaze in order to exist.
If that gaze turns elsewhere, you literally disappear.
Not metaphorically — there is a dimension of your being that is constituted only as long as you are the object of someone else’s desire.
When that desire migrates, you fall into existential crisis.
This is not insecurity; it is ontological terror.
And what happens when you finally “conquer” what you desired?
When the inaccessible person becomes accessible, when “maybe” turns to “yes”, when resistance dissolves into surrender?
Desire dies.
Not gradually — almost instantly.
Because desire never wanted the object; it wanted tension, distance, impossibility.
Desire does not seek satisfaction; it seeks perpetuation.
It is vampiric by nature: it feeds on lack, withers in satiety.
That is why passionate relationships so often die after the “conquest”.
The initial passion was sustained by uncertainty, by projection, by the other as enigma to be decoded.
But when the enigma dissolves, when you “know” the person, when they become familiar, predictable, available — the theatre of desire loses its script.
What remains?
Either you build something new, grounded in real reciprocity rather than libidinal economy, or you chase the next enigma, the next stage, the next audience.
This explains the love-triangles that repeat in certain people’s lives.
It is no coincidence; it is structure.
The person who falls only for those already committed is not being “difficult” — they are revealing something essential about the architecture of their desire: they need a mediator.
They need to desire through someone else’s desire.
“He is desirable because she desires him” is the hidden logic.
Without that mediation, interest evaporates.
In the family context this dynamic becomes even more disturbing.
Children frequently become depositaries of their parents’ unfulfilled desire.
“I want you to be a doctor” is rarely about vocation — it is about the father who wanted and failed.
The child is not living their own desire; they are being traversed by parental desire.
Their life becomes the stage on which parents perform the play they were never able to star in.
When that child grows up and realises they built an entire life around someone else’s script, the crisis is devastating.
In the workplace the same logic appears as the insatiable quest for recognition.
The employee who needs constant approval from the manager is not merely seeking professional feedback — they are chasing the existential validation that has always eluded them.
Workaholism often masks this wound: work becomes the Big Other that is never fully satisfied, always demanding more, always promising that after the next promotion, the next project, you will finally feel enough.
But the goal moves.
Because it is not about the work; it is about the structural incompleteness you try to plug with productivity.
So how do we exit this theatre?
How do we build relationships that are not sophisticated enactments of neurotic libidinal economy?
First, accept the unacceptable: you will never be complete.
No relationship will fill the structural crack that constitutes you as a subject.
Acceptance is not resignation — it is liberation.
When you stop seeking wholeness in the other you can finally find something more precious: real reciprocity.
Not the toxic romantic “you complete me”, but the mature “you accompany me in my incompleteness”.
Second, develop the capacity to hold your own lack creatively rather than anxiously.
Incompleteness can be a source of anguish or of movement.
Artists, thinkers, genuine creators are people who turned structural lack into creative fuel.
They are not trying to plug the void — they are dancing with it.
Third, learn to distinguish between desiring and desiring to be desired.
This demands brutal honesty.
When you pursue someone, pause and ask:
Do I really want this person, or do I want the validation they can give me?
Do I want to truly know them, or do I want to be seen by them?
That distinction changes everything: whom you choose, how you relate, what you expect.
Fourth, abandon the fantasy of the other as perfect mirror.
People do not exist to reflect the image you wish to have of yourself.
They carry their own incompletions, their own traversed desires, their own structural wounds.
Healthy relationships arise when two incomplete subjects coexist without demanding the impossible task of mutual completion.
There is a possible joy in this recognition — not the shallow joy of “toxic positivity”, but something deeper and sustainable: the joy of finally stopping to search outside for what was never available there — totality.
When you give up that impossible quest, something strange happens: you become able to love.
Not love as capture, possession, void-filler, but love as openness, witnessing, presence that demands nothing beyond presence.
Relational authenticity begins precisely there: when you can be with the other without needing them as an existential crutch; when you can desire without turning desire into handcuffs; when you accept that the other has the fundamental right to disappoint you, to fail everything you projected, to exist outside the script you mentally wrote.
Curiously, it is at the moment of abandoning the fantasy of completion that the deepest relationships become possible.
Only when you stop using the other as a mirror can you finally see them — see who they really are instead of who you need them to be.
And to be seen, truly seen — not as projection, not as theatrical role, not as object of libidinal economy, but as singular, irreducible presence, with all your faults and wounds — that is intimacy.
The invisible theatre of desire will keep running; that is the human condition.
But you can choose between being an unconscious puppet or a conscious playwright; between reciting lines you never wrote or improvising from an honest recognition of the game’s structure; between seeking an audience to validate your existence or building relationships where mutual existence needs no applause.
In the end, the essential question is not “how to be loved” — it is “how to love without turning love into a demand for salvation”.
Because when you finally give up being saved by the other’s gaze, you discover something revolutionary: the capacity to be alone without loneliness and accompanied without dependence.
It is in that impossible balance that the only genuine relational health resides.
The stage is set.
The lights never go out.
But you can consciously choose which play to perform.
And perhaps — just perhaps — you will find that the best performance is the one that needs no script: the one that emerges from real presence, from accepted incompleteness, from desire that does not need the other as mirror but meets them as companion on this absurd, magnificent journey called existence.

#humanrelationships #mentalhealth #authenticity #humandevelopment #relationalpsychology #selfknowledge #consciousness #healthyrelationships #personalgrowth #marcellodesouza #marcellodesouzaofficial #coachingandu

Would you like to deepen your understanding of the invisible dynamics that shape your relationships, your professional development and your mental health?
Visit my blog, where you will find hundreds of articles on cognitive, behavioural, human and organisational development, plus insights on healthy, evolving relationships.
Go to marcellodesouza.com.br and transform the way you see yourself and the world.