HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS: BEYOND THE MYTH OF COMPLETENESS

What if everything we’ve been taught about healthy relationships was fundamentally wrong?
We grew up hearing that a healthy relationship is one where two halves meet to form a whole. Where conflicts are rare because “we understand each other perfectly.” Where communication flows effortlessly because “we speak the same language.” Where the other completes us, fills us, saves us from our own incompleteness. This romantic narrative, endlessly repeated in books, films, and inspirational posts, carries one of the greatest emotional traps of our time: the promise that the right love will spare us the work of becoming whole ourselves.
The truth is that truly healthy relationships operate on a radically opposite logic. They do not exist to complete us—they exist to confront us with who we really are when no one is watching. They are relentless mirrors that reflect not only our rehearsed virtues, but also our oldest patterns, our poorly healed wounds, our escape strategies developed over decades. And it is precisely in this confrontation, in this friction between two wholenesses that meet without merging, that something extraordinary emerges: the possibility of growing without losing oneself.
Observe the couples you have known for years. Not those who display perfect harmony on social media, but those you see up close, in the unedited moments of everyday life. How many of them seem truly alive? How many still have that sparkle in their eyes when talking about each other, even after a decade or two together? How many still surprise each other, not with grand romantic gestures, but with the ability to reveal layers that time, in theory, should have already exhausted?
The few who maintain this vitality share something curious: they are not the ones who avoid tensions, but those who have learned to inhabit them without collapsing. They have developed a rare skill in times of disposable relationships: they can endure the discomfort of having their expectations frustrated without immediately blaming the other or fleeing to the next story. They stay when every cell in their body screams to leave. They listen when every impulse begs to retort. They allow themselves to be transformed by what the other reveals, even when that revelation destabilizes the comfortable version they had of themselves.
However, there is a dangerous misconception that needs to be dismantled here: this staying has nothing to do with heroic sacrifice or masochistic endurance. It is not about tolerating destructive relationships in the name of an outdated romantic ideal. It is about something far more subtle and infinitely more difficult: the ability to distinguish between discomfort that destroys and discomfort that builds.
The discomfort that destroys is the one that systematically diminishes us. That demands we erase essential parts of who we are to fit the shape the other needs. That turns vulnerability into a weapon, intimacy into vigilance, presence into performance. In these relationships, each day subtracts something—self-esteem, vitality, a sense of possibility. They are parasitic bonds disguised as love, where one feeds on the other’s energy until only the shell of what both once were remains.
The discomfort that builds, on the other hand, operates in a completely different way. It expands us, even though it hurts. It reveals limitations we did not want to admit, whose awareness frees us. It challenges behavioral patterns that worked in the past but now imprison us. It demands we develop emotional muscles we preferred to keep atrophied. And curiously, although it is hard to traverse these moments, something deep within us recognizes their necessity. A profound part knows we are growing, not shrinking. Evolving, not merely surviving.
The great question few dare to ask is: how do we tell the difference? How to distinguish between a relationship that challenges us to grow and one that simply corrodes us?
The answer is not in the moments of crisis—these always hurt, regardless of the type of relationship. The answer lies in the intervals. In what happens between the storms. On uneventful Tuesdays, lazy Sundays, banal conversations about what to have for dinner. It is there that the true nature of the bond reveals itself. If in these seemingly insignificant moments you feel you can breathe, that you do not need to edit your thoughts before voicing them, that there is space for silences that do not demand filling, you are facing something healthy. If, on the contrary, even the calm moments carry a muffled tension, a constant need to prove something, a feeling of always being one step behind in the game, it is time to deeply question what is being built there.
Healthy relationships have a specific atmospheric quality: they expand. Not in the sense of making us larger than we are, inflating egos or feeding illusions of grandeur. They expand in the sense of broadening the field of the possible within us. We discover we can be more honest without the world collapsing. More vulnerable without being devoured. More assertive without being abandoned. The other does not become our therapist or savior; they function as a kind of resonance chamber where dormant parts of our humanity can finally vibrate.
There are people who go through life collecting relationships without ever experiencing this. They jump from story to story, always searching for the right person, without realizing they carry the same pattern of emotional avoidance. They seek someone who does not “complicate” them, who is “light,” who “brings no problems.” What they truly seek is someone who does not force them to look at their own shadows. And they repeatedly find ever more sophisticated versions of the same superficiality that keeps them safe—and empty.
Because here lies the central paradox of human relationships: we can only be truly intimate with someone when we accept that this intimacy will inevitably hurt us from time to time. Not out of cruelty, not out of incompatibility, simply because two distinct consciousnesses, with different histories and unique wounds, cannot coexist without occasionally pressing each other’s sensitive points. The question is not whether there will be pain—there will be. The question is what we do with it when it arises.
The couples who understand this develop something extraordinary: a kind of expanded emotional tolerance. They can feel anger without turning it into repudiation. Experience disappointment without translating it as betrayal. Traverse periods of disconnection without immediately decreeing the end. Not because they are passive or resigned, but because they have built, over time, enough evidence that the other is capable of returning. Of repairing. Of trying again. And this evidence does not come from promises or grand declarations; it comes from small acts of presence accumulated in thousands of seemingly banal moments.
It is in these microscopic details that the health of a relationship truly manifests. In the way one apologizes—not with defensive justifications, but with genuine responsibility. In the capacity to receive criticism without immediately counterattacking. In the willingness to let go of being right to preserve the bond. In the courage to say “I need time alone” without fear that the other will interpret it as rejection. In the ability to celebrate the other’s achievements even when our own battles remain unfinished.
None of this is instinctive. Everything needs to be learned, practiced, refined. And here lies another dangerous misconception: the idea that healthy relationships “flow naturally.” They do not flow. They require deliberate attention, constant adjustments, frequent recalibrations. They are living organisms that sicken when neglected and flourish when nourished with conscious presence. The difference is that, when genuinely healthy, this work does not weigh like obligation; it pulses like a choice renewed with each dawn.
There is a kind of grace in this process. Not the aesthetic grace of romantic postcards, but the functional grace of mechanisms that adjust perfectly over use. Two people who initially fumbled trying to sleep in the same bed gradually find their rhythms. Arms that once did not know where to rest discover natural fits. Breaths that estranged each other learn to synchronize. It is like watching two dancers who, after years of joint practice, no longer need to look at their feet—the body has learned.
This learning only happens when both decide to stay on the floor long enough for their bodies to memorize the steps. Long enough to err without giving up. To step on each other’s toes and be forgiven. To occasionally stumble over their own pride and have someone there willing to extend a hand. In an era obsessed with instant connections and immediate gratifications, this availability for long time has become almost revolutionary.
Healthy relationships operate on their own temporal scale. They do not follow the speed of algorithms or the urgency of notifications. They develop in layers, like trees that grow imperceptibly day by day; when we look at the inner rings decades later, they reveal the full history of storms traversed and springs celebrated. Each resolved conflict adds a ring. Each shared vulnerability deepens the roots. Each season of distancing followed by reconnection strengthens the trunk.
And then, without anyone officially decreeing it, something changes. What once required conscious effort becomes second nature. The way a question “how was your day?” carries decades of “I really want to know.” Silence ceases to be threatening and becomes just another form of companionship. The other’s irritating habits transform into peculiarities that, strangely, we would miss if they disappeared. Not because we stopped seeing them, but because we learned they are part of the complete package—and it is this complete package, with all its constitutive imperfections, that we choose to embrace.
This is not resignation. It is something infinitely more sophisticated: the visceral understanding that perfection was never the goal. That we were chasing the wrong mirage from the start. That the beauty of a healthy relationship lies not in the absence of edges, but in how those edges fit without needing to be sanded until they vanish.
There are couples who age together and couples who merely accumulate years side by side. The difference is not in chronological time, but in what they did with each window of possibility that opened between them. Each moment they could have fled, they stayed. Each time they could have lied, they chose the uncomfortable truth. Each occasion they could have protected their images, they preferred to expose their weaknesses. It is these seemingly small choices, made at thousands of invisible crossroads over the years, that determine whether a relationship ages like wine or like milk.
The final paradox is that healthy relationships prepare us to live well alone. It seems contradictory, but it is not. By teaching us that we are worthy of love even with our inconsistencies, that our feelings can be expressed without destroying everything, that vulnerability strengthens rather than weakens, these relationships return us to ourselves more whole than when we arrived. We no longer need the other as an emotional crutch or external validation. We choose the other as expansion, not as filling a void.
And this daily choice, renewed with each dawn without automatism or guarantees, is perhaps the most courageous act available to contemporary humans. Because in times when everything can be swapped with a finger swipe on the screen, staying when it is difficult, rebuilding when it is broken, believing when evidence suggests giving up—all this requires a faith that does not come from romantic naivety, but from something deeper: the conviction that some bonds are worth traversing any storm, not despite their difficulty, but precisely because of it.
Because in the end, what we carry with us are not the moments when everything flowed perfectly. We carry the scars from battles fought side by side. The wrinkles from laughing together so much and crying together so much. The stories no one else would believe if we told them. The layers of meaning accumulated in gestures that, to any stranger, would seem banal, but to us carry decades of “I see you.”
Healthy relationships do not save us from life. They return us to it, whole and expanded, ready to inhabit it with all the intensity that was always available but, alone, we could not reach.
#HealthyRelationships #WholenessThatMeets #DiscomfortThatBuilds #LongTimeOfBonds #LoveAsDailyChoice #IntimacyThatExpands #CourageToStay #BondsThatLiberate #marcellodesouza #marcellodesouzaoficial #coachingevoce
Enjoyed this reflection? Visit my blog and explore hundreds of articles on human cognitive-behavioral development, conscious relationships, and organizational evolution. Original texts that challenge common sense and expand your way of seeing the world, people, and yourself.

www.marcellodesouza.com.br — Because some readings do not just inform: they transform.