WHO YOU NEED TO STOP BEING TO FINALLY CHANGE

Yesterday, I wrote about why “never again” is the most honest lie we tell ourselves. I thank everyone who read, shared, and reflected. But some people sent me questions, and the one that caught my attention the most was: “Marcello, if it’s not through dramatic promises, then how do we really change?”
The answer is not in who you promise to become. It’s in who you need to stop being.
You don’t change because you’re weak. You don’t change because you still believe transformation is conquest, when in reality, it is surrender. And surrender, for the contemporary Western ego, sounds dangerously close to defeat.
There is a philosophical lie that spans centuries and contaminates every change methodology you’ve ever tried: the idea that the “self” is a fixed entity that can be improved, optimized, transformed — but will remain, in essence, the same “self,” just upgraded. As if you were software that just needs updates to run more efficiently.
That’s not how it works.
Real transformation is not linear evolution. It is symbolic death. It is the deliberate collapse of the entire identity structure you’ve spent decades building to feel safe, predictable, socially acceptable. And the part no one tells you — because it would completely ruin the billion-dollar self-help market — is that you cannot want to change and simultaneously remain who you are.
These two things are ontologically incompatible.
Think with me: the person you are now was meticulously constructed as an adaptive response to everything you’ve experienced. Every behavioral pattern you hate, every automatic reaction that shames you, every limit that imprisons you — all of it exists because, at some point in your history, it was the most intelligent solution available to the problem you faced.
That child who learned to become invisible to avoid the unpredictable chaos of a dysfunctional family wasn’t being cowardly. They were surviving. And that invisibility pattern, thirty years later, manifests as an inability to speak up in meetings, to negotiate salaries, to occupy the space you deserve. You’re not “failing to be assertive.” You’re being loyally consistent with the survival mechanism that kept you alive.
That teenager who discovered that being funny deflected attention from their social inadequacy wasn’t manipulating. They were protecting themselves. And that pattern, decades later, crystallizes into an inability to have serious conversations, to access vulnerability, to be loved for who you really are — because you’ve forgotten who you are when you’re not performing.
Do you want to change these patterns?
Then you need to be willing to kill the person they created.
And here lies the brutal paradox that no Instagram coach will tell you: the part of you that “wants to change” is exactly the same part that needs to cease to exist for change to happen. You cannot use the ego to transcend the ego. You cannot use the same control mechanisms to abandon the need for control. You cannot “want it badly” to stop wanting.
That’s why every New Year’s resolution fails. Not due to lack of discipline. Not due to inadequate methods. But because you’re trying to add new behaviors to an identity structure that was built precisely to prevent those behaviors.
You want to be vulnerable? But your identity was forged in the belief that vulnerability is mortal weakness.
You want to set boundaries? But your sense of worth depends entirely on being needed, indispensable, inexhaustible.
You want to create? But your entire self-image is anchored in “doing it right” — and genuine creation is, by definition, chaotic, imperfect, risky.
The transformation you claim to want is, literally, incompatible with the person you are.
And until you stop trying to reconcile these two things — until you accept that changing means betraying who you’ve been — you’ll remain trapped in the same cycle: promises in January, giving up in March, guilt in December.
So the real question, the only one that matters, is not “how do I change?”
It’s: “Am I willing to cease existing as I am to become someone I don’t yet know?”
Because if the answer is “no” — and that’s okay if it is — at least you can stop pretending you want transformation and start living honestly within the limits you’ve chosen to keep.
But if the answer is “yes”…
…then brace yourself. Because what follows won’t be comfortable, motivational, or inspiring. It will be the systematic dismantling of everything you believe yourself to be.

THE ILLUSION OF METHOD
There is an entire market built on the fantasy that human transformation can be systematized. Buy this course. Follow these seven steps. Apply this revolutionary neuroscience-based methodology (which is actually just common sense wrapped in scientific jargon).
And it works — commercially. Because selling method is selling control. And control is what the ego craves most: the illusion that, if we just know the right protocol, we can redesign ourselves without having to die to ourselves.
But here’s the inconvenient truth: there is no method for what requires surrender.
You don’t “apply a technique” to traverse grief. You don’t “follow steps” to access authentic vulnerability. You don’t “implement a system” to become someone fundamentally different. These things happen when you stop trying to control them.
And that’s precisely why methods fail. Not because they’re technically incorrect — many are even sophisticated. They fail because they operate from the misguided premise that you can manage your own dissolution.
You can’t.
Real transformation happens in the moment you let go. When you stop negotiating with life. When you accept that the person you’ve built so carefully — with all your defenses, masks, survival strategies — simply no longer serves.
And then comes the terrifying part: you don’t know who you’ll be afterward. There are no guarantees. No certificates that “it will work out.” No promise that you’ll be happier, more successful, more loved.
The only certainty is that you will no longer be the same.
And that, for most people, is too terrifying to consider.

THE FOUR PARADOXES YOU NEED TO INHABIT (NOT RESOLVE)
Forget steps. Forget methodology. What I’m about to present isn’t techniques. They are existential dilemmas you won’t resolve — you’ll only learn to inhabit with increasing lucidity.

PARADOX 1: You can only change when you stop trying to change
Every transformation effort that begins with “I need to fix myself” is doomed from the start. Because “fixing” presupposes something is wrong, broken, inadequate — and that very belief is the problem.
That anxiety you’re trying to eliminate? It exists because some part of you doesn’t feel safe. And the more you fight it, the more you confirm you’re not safe — after all, if you were, you wouldn’t need to fight.
That procrastination pattern you hate? It protects you from something. Maybe fear of failure. Maybe terror of success and the visibility it brings. Maybe the discovery that, even giving your best, it still wouldn’t be enough.
You don’t change by deciding to “fix” these patterns. You change when you become curious about why they exist.
When you stop warring against yourself and start investigating — with the same scientific curiosity you’d observe a natural phenomenon — “How interesting. Every time I need to make an important decision, my body gets sick. Why?”
Change happens not when you force it, but when you understand. And genuine understanding naturally dissolves what no longer makes sense.

PARADOX 2: The identity you want to abandon is maintained by the people you love
No one changes in a vacuum. Your current identity isn’t just yours — it was co-constructed in your relationships. And here’s what no one tells you: the people around you have an emotional investment in you remaining exactly as you are.
That partner who “wants you to change” but subtly sabotages every attempt? They’re not being contradictory. They’re scared. Because if you truly change, the entire relational dynamic will need renegotiation. And renegotiation means loss of predictability.
That family who says “you should take better care of yourself” but criticizes every time you set a boundary? They’re not hypocrites. They’re operating from a system that needs you in the role of inexhaustible caregiver. If you leave that role, the whole system collapses.
Those friends who say “we love the new you” but stop inviting you when you stop being the group’s clown? They didn’t abandon you. You stopped fulfilling the function that justified your presence.
Changing means betraying expectations. And betrayal has consequences.
You may lose relationships. You may be isolated. You may be punished with silence, with criticism disguised as “concern,” with withdrawal of affection.
And here’s the brutal choice no one talks about: sometimes you have to decide between being loved by others or respected by yourself.
The two aren’t always compatible.

PARADOX 3: Micro-actions don’t work without identity death
There’s a contemporary obsession with “small steps.” “Start slow.” “One step at a time.” And yes, there’s wisdom in that — when applied correctly.
But here’s what the shallow version doesn’t tell you: micro-actions without identity transformation are just sophisticated procrastination.
You can “read two pages a day” for years and still see yourself as someone who doesn’t read. You can “meditate five minutes every morning” and remain fundamentally anxious. You can “go to the gym three times a week” and still identify as sedentary.
Because action alone changes nothing. What changes is the story you tell about who you are while performing that action.
It’s not about opening the book. It’s about who you’re being when you open the book.
It’s not about sitting to meditate. It’s about allowing yourself to experience stillness — something you may have spent your whole life avoiding because stillness brings to the surface everything you bury with compulsive movement.
It’s not about going to the gym. It’s about becoming someone for whom caring for the body isn’t punishment or compensation, but a natural expression of respect for being alive.
The micro-action is just the ritual. Transformation happens in the identity rewrite that accompanies the ritual.
And that requires being present in the act. Not automated. Not dissociated. But radically aware that each repetition is a vote: “This is who I choose to be.”

PARADOX 4: You need to learn to extract pleasure from what doesn’t yet gratify
Here lies perhaps the most brutal challenge of transformation: all the behaviors you want to cultivate have delayed rewards. While old patterns offer immediate gratification.
Eating fast food? Instant pleasure. Cooking a nutritious meal? Effort now, diffuse benefit later.
Scrolling social media? Immediate dopamine. Reading a dense book? Cognitive effort now, understanding perhaps weeks later.
Avoiding conflict? Instant anxiety relief. Setting a necessary boundary? Discomfort now, dignity… eventually.
How do you compete with immediate gratification?
You don’t compete. You recalibrate your reward system.
And that doesn’t happen through willpower. It happens when you develop the capacity — rare, sophisticated, immensely difficult — to extract satisfaction from coherence.
Not from the outcome. From coherence.
You eat that nutritious meal not because “you’ll lose weight” (abstract future), but because in this exact moment, you’re acting coherently with someone who respects their own body. And there’s a deep satisfaction — not pleasurable, not euphoric, but solid — in coherence.
You have that difficult conversation not because “it will improve the relationship” (maybe it won’t), but because right now, you’re being someone who doesn’t betray themselves to keep the peace. And there’s dignity in that which no temporary conflict relief can ever provide.
This is emotional maturity.
The ability to sustain present discomfort in the name of present integrity — not for future benefits.
And no one develops this without repeatedly crossing the experience of choosing coherence when it hurts.

THE FIFTH ELEMENT: SURRENDER AS METHOD
And here we arrive at the territory no transformation methodology dares to tread. Because what I’m about to say completely destroys the personal development industry.
All — every single one — behavioral change approaches start from the same assumption: you need to do more. More discipline. More techniques. More effort. More control. More awareness. More, more, more.
As if transformation were accumulation.
But what if it’s the opposite?
What if the only real change happens when you stop trying to transform yourself?
Not out of giving up. Not out of resignation. But out of something infinitely more radical: unconditional acceptance of what is, before any attempt at change.
Let me be brutally clear: you cannot change what you do not accept. Impossible. Because non-acceptance creates a war relationship with reality. And in a state of war, all your energy goes to defense, attack, resistance — nothing left for transformation.
That person who hates their own body spends their life fighting it. Punitive diets. Exercise as punishment. Mirror as battlefield. And the body responds to war with more war: dysregulated metabolism, compulsions, sabotage.
That man who despises his own “emotional weakness” builds an ever-thicker armor. And the armor works — until it doesn’t. Until he finds himself completely dissociated from himself, incapable of feeling anything, alive only technically.
That woman who fights her “excessive need for approval” punishes herself every time she notices the pattern. “I shouldn’t need this. Something’s wrong with me.” And the punishment only reinforces the belief in inadequacy that fuels the need for approval. A perfect circle of self-sabotage.
The war against oneself is unbeatable. Because in every internal war, you are both attacker and attacked.
So what remains?
Surrender.
But not surrender-giving-up. Radical acceptance-surrender.
“I am someone who, right now, procrastinates. Not because I’m lazy, but because something in me is afraid. Can I be with that fear? Can I allow it to exist without needing to eliminate it immediately?”
“I am someone who compulsively seeks external approval. Not because I’m pathetic, but because at some point in my history, external approval meant survival. Can I honor that? Can I thank this pattern for keeping me alive until now, even if it now imprisons me?”
“I am someone who closes off emotionally. Not because I’m cold, but because openness once meant danger. Can I respect that protective strategy before demanding it disappear?”
Acceptance is not agreement. Acceptance is judgment-free recognition of what is.
And here’s the final paradox, the most counterintuitive of all:
Only when you stop trying to change does change become possible.
Because acceptance dissolves resistance. And without resistance, you can finally see what’s really happening. You can investigate. You can understand. You can choose consciously — not from hatred of who you are, but from clarity about who you want to become.
The person who accepts procrastination can, for the first time, ask instead of punish: “What am I avoiding? What fear is this? What would happen if I actually did what needs to be done?”
The person who accepts their need for approval can, for the first time, observe the pattern without fully identifying with it: “Interesting. I’m about to say what the other wants to hear, not what I really think. Why do I do this? What do I imagine will happen if I’m honest?”
The person who accepts their emotional closure can, for the first time, gradually experiment with vulnerability — not because they “should,” but because they choose to investigate what it would be like to live differently.
Acceptance doesn’t paralyze. Acceptance liberates.
Because finally, you’re no longer spending monumental energy fighting yourself. Finally, you can use that energy to understand, experiment, choose.
And here’s what no one tells you: this surrender, this radical acceptance, is the hardest work there is.
It’s infinitely easier to fight. Easier to hate yourself. Easier to make dramatic change promises. Easier to read one more self-help book, buy one more course, follow one more guru.
Because all that keeps you busy. And busyness is an excellent way to avoid surrender.
Surrender requires you to stop. To silence. To look, without filters, at who you really are now — with all the patterns you hate, all the fears you hide, all the inadequacy you try to compensate for.
And stay there.
Without escaping to “I’ll change this.” Without jumping to “I’ll apply a technique.” Without anesthetizing with “but I’m better than this.”
Just: “I am this. Right now. And it’s okay.”
And when you finally manage to do that — when you can be with yourself without war — something changes.
Not because you tried to change.
But because you stopped preventing change from happening.

2026: THE YEAR WHEN CONSENTED MEDIOCRITY CEASES TO BE TOLERABLE
We are entering a different year. You feel it, even if you can’t quite name what it is.
2026 won’t be just another year of promises, restarts, intention lists that die in February. There’s something in the air — an acceleration, an intensification, a growing demand.
The world is changing at a speed that makes remaining on autopilot unsustainable. Structures that seemed solid reveal themselves fragile. Certainties that seemed eternal prove temporary. Roles that seemed to define who we are become increasingly obvious masks.
And in the face of this, you have two choices:
Awaken or fossilize.
There is no more comfortable middle ground. No more space for conscious mediocrity — the kind where you know you’re living below your potential but choose the comfort of familiarity because change scares too much.
2026 will no longer tolerate it. Not because the world is cruel, but because the speed of change doesn’t wait.
People who continue on autopilot — repeating the same patterns, avoiding the same difficult conversations, postponing the same necessary choices — won’t just stagnate. They’ll become irrelevant. Not by being replaced, but by choosing to remain automated versions of themselves while life demanded radical presence.
And radical presence isn’t something you add to your routine. It’s not another item on the “things to improve” list.
Radical presence is what happens when you finally stop running from yourself.
When you look in the mirror — not the literal mirror, but the merciless mirror of your own consciousness — and ask:
“Am I living coherently with what truly matters to me? Or am I just repeating the script handed to me?”
“Do the choices I make daily bring me closer to who I want to be? Or push me away, one micro-compromise at a time?”
“Do the people I love truly know me? Or do they know only the edited, performative, safe version I choose to show?”
“Is my work an authentic expression of what I have to offer the world? Or is it just financial survival disguised as purpose?”
These aren’t questions to answer quickly. They are questions to inhabit throughout all of 2026.
And here’s the part that will separate those who truly want transformation from those who just want the comforting feeling of trying:
You don’t need to have the answers.
You just need the courage to remain with the questions long enough for them to dismantle all the ready-made answers.
Because transformation doesn’t happen when you find the right answer. Transformation happens when you become someone capable of asking better questions.
And 2026, with all its intensity, all its demand, all its unpredictability, is the perfect year for that.
So here’s my final invitation to you:
Stop making resolution lists.
Choose one single question — the one you most fear answering — and commit to remaining with it for the next 365 days.
Not to solve it. But to let it transform you.
It could be: “Who am I when no one is watching?”
Or: “What do I really want, separate from what I was taught to want?”
Or: “How much of my current life did I choose, and how much was inherited or imposed?”
Or: “If I died tomorrow, would I have lived the life I wanted to live?”
Choose the question that scares you.
And instead of seeking the answer, become the answer.
Because in the end, you don’t change by deciding who you want to be.
You change by stopping being who you’ve always been.
And that, my friend, is not a New Year’s resolution.
It is an existential commitment to your own integrity.
2026 is waiting.
Not the improved version of you.
Not the optimized version of you.
But the true version of you — the one you’ve spent your whole life avoiding becoming because it seemed too dangerous, too vulnerable, too unpredictable.
That version is the only one that matters.
The rest is just noise.

#realtransformation #humandevelopment #deepselfknowledge #behavioralchange #emotionalawareness #personalidentity #surrender #radicalacceptance #existentialcoherence #radicalpresence #meaningfullife #2026 #consciousawakening #humanevolution #personalintegrity #marcellodesouza #marcellodesouzaoficial #coachingevoce #SymbolicDeath #RadicalSurrender #IdentityDissolution #CoherenceOverComfort #ExistentialBetrayal #FossilizationOrAwakening #PresenceOverPerformance #TrueSelf2026 #BeyondSelfHelp #OntologicalShift

Want to continue exploring the hidden dimensions of human behavior, conscious relationships, and authentic organizational transformation?

Access my blog and dive into hundreds of articles that challenge conventional thinking and invite you to question not just what you do, but fundamentally who you choose to be.
👉 www.marcellodesouza.com.br

There you’ll find deep analyses on cognitive-behavioral development, evolutionary human relationships, and the invisible structures that govern both individuals and organizations. Original, provocative, and transformative content — because true change requires true thinking.